More
    Home Blog Page 2

    A simple breakdown of Strategy’s Bitcoin plan and what could shape future sales

    0

    Key takeaways

    • Strategy is the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, with roughly 650,000 BTC on its balance sheet.

    • The company’s model hinges on raising capital and converting it into BTC while keeping its market-cap-to-Bitcoin value (mNAV) above 1.

    • CEO Phong Le has described any Bitcoin sale as a “last resort” option that would be considered only if mNAV drops below 1 and access to new capital meaningfully deteriorates.

    • Even if Strategy chooses to sell a portion of its holdings, Bitcoin trades in a market with tens of billions in daily volume, and any sale would likely be targeted rather than a full exit.

    Strategy, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, has spent the past five years turning itself into what it calls “the world’s first and largest Bitcoin Treasury Company.”

    As of early December 2025, it held almost 650,000 Bitcoin (BTC), which is more than 3% of the 21 million supply and by far the largest stack owned by a public company.

    For many traditional investors, Strategy’s stock became a kind of leveraged proxy for Bitcoin. Instead of buying BTC directly, they chose the stock because the company raises capital and converts it into Bitcoin.

    The current debate comes from CEO Phong Le’s recent comments that a Bitcoin sale is possible under very specific conditions. Headlines often focus on the word “sell,” but the company presents this as risk management for extreme stress, not a shift in its long-term Bitcoin thesis.

    This article looks at how the plan works and what could trigger sales, helping readers interpret future news without panic or fear of missing out (FOMO). This guide is purely informational and not investment advice.

    Did you know? Recent estimates suggest that institutions now hold nearly 20% of all mined Bitcoin.

    How Strategy’s Bitcoin engine actually works

    Day to day, Strategy runs a relatively simple loop in financial terms. The company:

    1. Raises capital in traditional markets through common-stock at-the-market programs, multiple series of perpetual preferred stock, such as STRK and STRF, and occasional convertible debt.

    2. Uses much of that capital to buy more Bitcoin, which it treats as its primary treasury reserve asset.

    3. Tracks a set of metrics to judge whether this remains sustainable and accretive for shareholders.

    Two of those metrics matter here:

    • Bitcoin per share (BPS): How much BTC effectively sits behind each fully diluted share. Strategy publishes this as a key performance indicator.

    • Market-cap-to-net-asset-value (nNAV): The ratio between Strategy’s total market value and the market value of its Bitcoin holdings. If mNAV is above 1, the stock trades at a premium to its BTC.

    When the company trades at a healthy premium, it can raise new equity or preferred stock with less dilution and keep growing its Bitcoin stack. That base case — where Strategy raises at a premium, buys more BTC and grows BPS — is still the model that management says it is pursuing.

    The “last resort” sale trigger

    The new element is a clearly stated kill switch for that model.

    In recent interviews, Le explained that Strategy would consider selling some Bitcoin only if two conditions are met at the same time:

    1. mNAV falls below 1, which means the company’s market cap drops to or below the value of the Bitcoin it holds.

    2. Access to fresh capital dries up — e.g., if investors are no longer willing to buy its equity or preferred stock at viable terms.

    He described selling BTC in that scenario as a “last resort” toolkit option to meet obligations such as preferred dividends, not as a standing plan to sell the treasury.

    Put simply:

    If the stock trades at or below the value of the BTC and the company cannot refinance itself, then selling a slice of BTC becomes the least bad way to protect the overall structure.

    What could realistically push Strategy toward that line

    Several moving parts would have to line up before the “last resort” switch is even considered.

    Macro and Bitcoin price

    Bitcoin has already pulled back sharply from its October all-time high near $126,000 to the mid-$80,000s, a drop of roughly 30%. Deeper or more prolonged drawdowns compress the value of Strategy’s BTC stack and tend to pressure its stock at the same time.

    Equity performance and mNAV

    Strategy’s market cap premium to its Bitcoin has already narrowed after a 30%-60% slide in the stock from earlier highs. In mid-November, the company briefly traded around or even below the spot value of its holdings, which suggested mNAV near 1.

    Funding conditions

    The business rests on being able to issue new common and perpetual preferred shares through existing shelf registrations and at-the-market (ATM) programs. If those offerings slowed sharply or if investors demanded much higher yields, that would signal stress on the funding side.

    Internal obligations

    Strategy has sizeable annual commitments in the form of preferred dividends and debt service. Analysts put preferred dividend obligations in the hundreds of millions of dollars per year.

    Management still describes itself as a long-term Bitcoin accumulator, and the scenarios above describe a severe stress environment.

    Did you know? Onchain forensics suggest that 3 million-4 million BTC is likely lost forever in dead wallets, which means a significant portion of the supply will never return to the market.

    What a Strategy sale would and would not mean for Bitcoin

    Given that Strategy holds 650,000 BTC, any shift from “never sell” to “might sell under stress” naturally catches traders’ attention.

    Context is important, though:

    • Market size: Daily spot and derivatives volume in Bitcoin regularly runs into tens of billions of dollars. At the same time, US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have seen single-day inflows and outflows measured in billions. A controlled sale of a fraction of Strategy’s holdings, even if meaningful, would enter a very large and liquid market.

    • Likely scale and pace: Based on Le’s own comments, any sale in a stress scenario would be targeted and partial, aimed at meeting obligations or maintaining the capital structure rather than exiting Bitcoin.

    • Pricing in advance: Markets often start incorporating these possibilities as soon as they are disclosed. The recent pullback in both BTC and Strategy’s stock, along with debate over mNAV, is an example of that process.

    It is important to note that a conditional last resort sale framework is not the same thing as an announcement that large BTC sales are imminent.

    Did you know? In Q3 2025, average daily crypto spot trading volume was about $155 billion, and another $14 billion in notional crypto derivatives traded daily on CME alone.

    How to follow Strategy’s next moves

    For readers who want to track this story without reacting to every headline or meme, several observable indicators can help readers understand the situation more clearly:

    Start with primary sources.

    • US Securities and Exchange Commission filings, such as 8 Ks and prospectus supplements, show new capital raises and updated Bitcoin holdings.

    • Strategy’s press releases and its “Bitcoin Purchases” page summarize recent buys and total holdings.

    Watch the core metrics.

    • US Securities and Exchange Commission filings, such as 8 Ks and prospectus supplements, show new capital raises and updated Bitcoin holdings.

    • Strategy’s press releases and its “Bitcoin Purchases” page summarize recent buys and total holdings.

    • Social media activity often reflects sentiment rather than data. “Green dot” posts, laser eyes memes and doomsday threads can be useful for reading mood, but it is worth cross-checking any claim about forced selling or insolvency against filings and numbers.

    N.B. Financial situations, time horizons and risk tolerance vary by individual. This information is general in nature and should not be interpreted as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset. Readers should consider consulting a qualified financial professional for guidance that fits their circumstances.

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

    Source link

    Why Texas’ Bitcoin reserve move signals a shift in government crypto policy

    0

    Key takeaways

    • Texas became the first US state to add Bitcoin exposure to a state-managed investment portfolio by purchasing about $5 million of BlackRock’s IBIT ETF through its newly created Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

    • SB 21 shifted Texas from a crypto mining hub to an active digital asset investor. The bill authorizes the state comptroller to buy, hold and sell Bitcoin using a legislature-approved $10-million fund.

    • The initial allocation is small relative to Texas’ overall investment portfolio, which holds more than $667 million in S&P 500 ETFs. This signals a cautious and exploratory step.

    • Texas’ move stands apart from federal crypto programs, which deal mainly with seized assets. Texas made a proactive and budgeted investment.

    Texas took an unprecedented step in the US when it added Bitcoin (BTC) exposure to its state-managed investment portfolio. The state invested about $5 million in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) through its newly created Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The move shows how a state can treat digital assets as part of its long-term investment strategy.

    This article examines how Texas shifted from a mining center to a Bitcoin reserve state, how Senate Bill 21 (SB 21) changed its approach to digital assets and why the move suggests a broader shift in government policy.

    From mining hub to Bitcoin reserve

    Texas has long been a major center for Bitcoin mining because of its favorable energy prices and supportive regulations. Until 2025, however, the state itself did not own any Bitcoin.

    That changed in November 2025 when the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company purchased about $5 million of the IBIT exchange-traded fund (ETF), according to the Texas Blockchain Council. The purchase was made under SB 21, a law passed in June 2025 that created the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Official transaction records have not yet been released, but the law clearly authorizes such investments.

    Senate Bill 21, officially called the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Investment Act, created a special fund separate from the state treasury. This fund is managed by the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company under the same regulations that apply to other state investments.

    The law allows the state comptroller to buy, hold, manage and sell Bitcoin using money specifically approved by the legislature. Lawmakers set aside $10 million for this purpose.

    On Nov. 20, 2025, the state reportedly used half of that amount ($5 million) to buy shares of BlackRock’s IBIT Bitcoin ETF. This is said to be the first time any US state has directly purchased Bitcoin exposure with public funds.

    The state’s investment portfolio holds about $667 million in a large S&P 500 ETF and $34 million in another fund. If confirmed, the $5-million Bitcoin ETF position is small by comparison. It appears to be a cautious first step rather than a major change in strategy.

    Did you know? An Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund was one of the earliest government-linked institutions to hold a Bitcoin ETF.

    How SB 21 changes Texas’ approach to digital assets before this law

    Before SB 21, Texas’ focus on crypto was centered on mining, grid participation and economic incentives. SB 21 shifts the state from simply hosting the industry to becoming an investor itself.

    Senator Charles Schwertner, the bill’s main sponsor, described Bitcoin as the best-performing asset of the past decade. He argued that Texas should have the option to include it, just as it can invest in land or gold. Supporters of the bill emphasized long-term diversification and protection against inflation, not short-term price gains.

    Some analysts see Texas’ move as further evidence that major institutions are becoming more comfortable with Bitcoin ETFs. Others warn that Bitcoin’s high volatility creates added risks for public money and that governments must be especially careful when investing taxpayer funds in such assets. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas also noted that IBIT is now reportedly held by an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund.

    Why this looks like a shift in government crypto policy

    State governments in the US have generally viewed Bitcoin as either a regulatory issue or a factor affecting the power grid. SB 21 shifts that view by treating Bitcoin as an allowable long-term store of value that can be held and managed like traditional mutual funds. This is not an endorsement of Bitcoin’s price or value. It is a reclassification of how the asset is governed.

    Texas’ Bitcoin reserve differs from current federal digital asset programs. Federal efforts, such as the proposed US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve or the Digital Asset Stockpile, focus on cryptocurrency seized through law enforcement actions. By contrast, Texas’ reserve is funded directly by an act of the legislature and managed under the same fiduciary standards as other state investments.

    This difference carries weight. Texas is making an active and budgeted investment decision rather than passively accepting forfeited assets. However, the move does not create national policy because no federal law currently authorizes Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

    Several US states have explored similar ideas, but most remain in the planning stage. States such as Wyoming and Oklahoma have proposed legislation for digital asset reserves, but Texas is the only state to have completed an actual purchase.

    Did you know? Harvard Endowment made a $443-million bet on BlackRock’s IBIT. The investment accounts for about 20% of Harvard’s reported US-listed public equity holdings.

    What Texas’ Bitcoin reserve move does not mean

    Setting clear boundaries is important to avoid overstating the significance of Texas’ decision. Texas is not making Bitcoin legal tender or accepting it as payment for taxes, and it has not shifted its investment portfolio in any significant way toward digital assets.

    The move also does not create a binding precedent for the federal government or other states, nor does it signal a unified national policy. Most states and federal agencies continue to approach digital assets with caution, citing concerns about price volatility, consumer protection and energy use.

    Did you know? Analysts increasingly compare BTC reserves to traditional gold reserves. Bitcoin’s verifiable supply, transparent onchain traceability and fixed issuance make it an unconventional but measurable counterpart to gold.

    Policy risks and open questions

    Including Bitcoin in the state’s investment scheme exposes public officials to new forms of risk. Large price declines could generate political criticism, especially during budget reviews. Research on public fund management shows that high volatility can lead to questions about whether officials made appropriate decisions.

    SB 21 requires adequate record-keeping and fiduciary oversight, but specific operational rules such as rebalancing triggers, volatility limits, exit plans or any intention to move from ETF holdings to direct Bitcoin custody remain undisclosed.

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

    Source link

    Bank of America backs 1%–4% crypto allocation, opens door to Bitcoin ETFs

    0

    More big-name financial institutions are opening the door to Bitcoin exposure, signaling a growing institutional appetite for regulated digital asset products.

    Bank of America, the second-largest US bank, reportedly recommended a 1%–4% cryptocurrency allocation to its wealth management clients through the Merrill, Bank of America Private Bank and Merrill Edge platforms, according to a statement shared with Yahoo Finance on Tuesday.

    “For investors with a strong interest in thematic innovation and comfort with elevated volatility, a modest allocation of 1% to 4% in digital assets could be appropriate,” said Chris Hyzy, chief investment officer at Bank of America Private Bank, in the statement shared with Yahoo.

    Starting Jan. 5, the bank will enable its clients to gain access to four new Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB), Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC) and BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT).

    The development will enable the bank’s wealthiest clients to gain exposure to Bitcoin ETFs, which were previously only available upon request. The bank’s over 15,000 wealth advisers were unable to recommend any cryptocurrency investment products.

    “Our guidance emphasizes regulated vehicles, thoughtful allocation, and a clear understanding of both the opportunities and risks,” added the bank’s chief investment officer.

    The bank’s Bitcoin allocation recommendation is signaling a wider institutional appetite for regulated cryptocurrency investment products. It comes a day after Vanguard, the world’s second-largest asset manager, enabled crypto ETF trading for its clients, reversing its previous stance on digital asset ETFs.

    Source: Eric Balchunas 

    Cointelegraph has contacted Bank of America for more details on its crypto allocation recommendations.

    Bank of America is the second-largest bank in the US with about $2.67 trillion in consolidated assets and over 3,600 branches, according to Forbes.

    Largest US banks by assets. Source: Forbes.com

    Related: Bitcoin to end four-year cycle, break out to new highs in 2026: Grayscale

    BlackRock helped set the Bitcoin allocation playbook

    BlackRock, the world’s largest asset management firm, was the first big institution to recommend an up to 2% Bitcoin allocation to its clients, Cointelegraph reported in December 2024.

    Around 1%–2% is a “reasonable range for Bitcoin exposure,” which poses the “same share of overall portfolio risk” as a typical allocation to “the ‘magnificent 7’ group of mostly mega-cap tech stocks,” wrote BlackRock in a report at the time.

    The “magnificent 7” refers to Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Tesla, Meta and Nvidia.

    Related: Cathie Wood still bullish on $1.5M Bitcoin price target: Finance Redefined

    In June, asset management firm Fidelity also recommended a 2% to 5% Bitcoin allocation, which was small enough to minimize the risk of a Bitcoin crash, but large enough to enjoy any upside from BTC’s inflationary hedge.

    Earlier in October, Morgan Stanley also suggested a 2% to 4% allocation to crypto portfolios for investors and financial advisers, further signaling that large financial institutions are moving toward a shared playbook of modest, risk-managed exposure to digital assets.

    Magazine: Mysterious Mr Nakamoto author — Finding Satoshi would hurt Bitcoin