cURL Error: 0 Page 2 – Daily News
More
    Home Blog Page 2

    How the SEC’s revised 2025 plan could streamline crypto oversight

    0

    Key takeaways

    • For years, US crypto firms operated under overlapping rules from the SEC, CFTC, FTC and FinCEN. The revised 2025 plan signals Washington’s intent to build a more flexible and structured framework tailored to digital assets.

    • The SEC is moving toward a model centered on innovation, capital formation, market efficiency and investor protection. This marks an acknowledgment that crypto requires dedicated rules rather than adaptations of older regulations.

    • The plan may lead to exemptions, safe harbors, DLT-specific transfer agent rules and crypto market structure amendments. These steps could help integrate digital assets into traditional market infrastructure.

    • The plan’s success will depend on cross-agency coordination and international alignment between regulatory agencies. Strong execution could encourage other jurisdictions to adopt more consistent global standards for crypto.

    Since its early years, the US cryptocurrency industry has operated in an unclear regulatory environment. Different agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have been overlooking different aspects of the crypto ecosystem. In this scenario, crypto enterprises found it difficult to determine what was allowed and what was not.

    The SEC’s revised 2025 plan is likely to usher in positive change. It suggests that Washington, DC is seeking a more flexible regulatory framework that streamlines crypto oversight while supporting innovation.

    This article discusses the possible outcomes of the plan, its key points, the advantages it may bring and the risks it could involve. It also explores how the plan may influence the crypto ecosystem worldwide.

    Why the SEC’s revised 2025 plan matters

    Cryptocurrency has evolved well beyond its early speculative phase. Digital tokens are now traded on major platforms, institutional investors allocate funds to them, and tokenization is gradually entering traditional finance. In a fast-changing crypto landscape, regulations are always trying to catch up.

    The SEC’s new agenda reflects a shift in approach. It emphasizes innovation, capital management, market efficiency and investor protection. This shows the SEC’s acknowledgment that cryptocurrencies require tailored rules rather than adaptations of existing ones.

    Industry representatives have highlighted the lack of clear compliance guidelines and the conflicting interpretations of existing rules. They also point out the tendency to prioritize enforcement over guidance. The SEC’s 2025 agenda includes initiatives that align with many industry concerns.

    Did you know? After the Mt. Gox exchange collapse in 2014, Japan became the first major economy to pass a dedicated crypto law in 2017. Japan officially recognized Bitcoin (BTC) as a legal payment method and encouraged exchanges to adopt bank-level security standards.

    Major elements of the SEC’s 2025 plan

    This comprehensive agenda outlines the key areas and initiatives the SEC will pursue to safeguard investors:

    New rules for issuing and selling digital assets

    The SEC intends to establish clear guidelines for the issuance of digital assets, which may include exemptions or safe harbor provisions for token projects. This would help determine when a token is considered a security, when it is not and what information issuers must provide. For startups, such clarity would reduce the uncertainty that surrounds token launches.

    Permission for crypto trading on national securities exchanges

    The SEC is considering changes that would allow digital assets to be traded directly on registered national exchanges and alternative trading systems. These potential amendments aim to bring crypto assets closer to the regulated infrastructure used for traditional stocks, improve surveillance, strengthen investor protections and reduce reliance on less regulated offshore platforms.

    Simplified disclosure requirements

    The plan aims to streamline and modernize disclosure and compliance obligations for publicly listed companies, including those involved with digital assets. This would reduce administrative burdens for both cryptocurrency-focused firms and traditional businesses and encourage broader adoption.

    Clearer rules for crypto intermediaries

    Broker-dealers, custodians and trading platforms have operated under uncertain regulatory requirements. The new agenda seeks to clarify how existing rules for securities intermediaries apply to cryptocurrency activities. This would allow more financial institutions, banks and fintech companies to offer crypto-related services with greater confidence.

    Streamlining disclosures and reducing compliance burden

    The SEC intends to propose a framework for streamlining disclosures. The agency’s primary role involves establishing disclosure standards designed to enhance clarity and mitigate investor risk. With the revised plan, the agency aims to reduce the compliance burden for public companies, particularly regarding shareholder proposals.

    The following table provides a brief overview of the SEC’s revised 2025 plan:

    Salient points of the SEC revised 2025 plan

    Benefits of the SEC’s revised 2025 plan

    The SEC’s 2025 plan aims to enhance protection for individual investors, promote fair competition for issuers and financial institutions and strengthen the integrity and efficiency of the capital markets.

    • For cryptocurrency startups: Clearer regulations could lower legal risks and speed up product development. They would allow companies to stay in the US and grow rather than relocate abroad.

    • For traditional financial institutions: Banks and asset managers would gain regulated pathways to participate in digital assets while remaining fully compliant.

    • For investors (retail and institutional): Investors would benefit from better disclosures, safer trading venues and more consistent oversight of platforms. The plan could reduce risks such as hidden leverage or manipulative trading practices.

    • For regulators and markets: A more unified approach would reduce overlap between agencies. It would enhance market surveillance and align cryptocurrency regulation with established financial safeguards.

    Did you know? Swiss regulators classify tokens based on their economic function as payment, utility or asset, similar to how farmers classify livestock. This approach helped Switzerland become one of the earliest global hubs for token innovation.

    Remaining questions, risks and potential global impact

    While the SEC’s revised 2025 plan looks promising, its success depends on several factors. For instance, it remains to be seen whether US agencies can coordinate effectively with regulators in other countries, given the global nature of cryptocurrencies.

    The SEC will need to find an appropriate balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors. This balance will determine whether the 2025 agenda becomes successful or remains a statement of intent.

    If the plan does not deliver tangible results, market participants will continue to face uncertainty. The US may lose innovation to other countries and risk its leadership in digital asset finance.

    When the US updates its regulatory framework, other jurisdictions take notice. Clearer rules in the US will encourage similar regulatory changes in the European Union, the UK and Asia and foster international cooperation. This will lead to more consistent global standards for stablecoins, tokenization and custody.

    The SEC’s 2025 regulatory agenda marks a significant shift toward replacing uncertainty with structure. If the proposed measures succeed, the US may enter a new phase in which cryptocurrency regulation supports responsible development and the protection of investors.

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

    Source link

    Polygon co-founder mulls resurrecting MATIC a year after POL rebrand

    0

    Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal spurred public discussion about the project’s token branding, asking the community if the network should consider reverting its ticker from POL to MATIC. 

    On Wednesday, Nailwal said that while he personally thinks that they should stick to POL, he continues to hear feedback that the original MATIC ticker had stronger recognition, especially among retail users who are now confused about the asset’s whereabouts. 

    “The counter-argument I keep getting is: the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went,” he wrote. 

    Because of this, he asked his followers on X if they think they should change the token back to MATIC. “I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up,” he said. 

    Cointelegraph reached out to Polygon for comments, but had not received a response by publication. 

    Source: Sandeep Nailwal

    Polygon token trades 89% below its all-time high

    On Sept. 4, 2024, Polygon migrated its MATIC tokens into POL and framed the change as an upgrade. At the time, Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron told Cointelegraph that POL “goes one step further” than its predecessor. 

    While MATIC only earned fees from gas and staking, the POL token will also earn fees from additional actions, such as securing data availability or decentralizing a sequencer.

    Polygon token’s one-year chart. Source: CoinGecko

    CoinGecko data shows that the Polygon token reached an all-time high of $1.29 on March 13, 2024. According to the data aggregator, the token is now trading at $0.13, which is about 89% below its all-time high. 

    Related: Polygon boss says he’s been ‘questioning his loyalty’ toward Ethereum

    Polygon community split on potential MATIC revert

    Community responses to Nailwal’s post reflected a split between users who viewed the ticker as a non-issue and those who expressed that brand recognition was important.

    An X user with the handle martijnde_boer said Polygon should keep on building because fundamentals matter more than tickers. 

    This was echoed by another X user, who said that POL had already gained acceptance. “I believe POL has already overcome the hardest part, which is initial acceptance. Stick with POL,” the user wrote. 

    On the other hand, several community members pushed back, noting that early adopters associate the project with MATIC and that retail familiarity remains a powerful factor. 

    “We haven’t really seen a new wave of retail entrants into the markets, so going back to Matic might actually be the play here,” Mo Ezeldin wrote

    While some argued for and against the ticker change, another user suggested going in a different direction, like making the ticker PGON. 

    “MATIC was the version most OGs remembered it by, but it probably feels less intuitive for new market participants to find it under that ticker. Maybe ‘PGON’ or something would’ve done the trick?” a user wrote