More
    Home Blog Page 2

    What Kyrgyzstan’s USDKG reveals about real-asset stablecoins in emerging markets

    0

    Key takeaways

    • Kyrgyzstan has launched USDKG, a USD-pegged stablecoin that the project says is backed by physical gold rather than cash and short-term US Treasurys.

    • The token was first deployed on Tron with a reported initial issuance of 50 million units, with plans to expand to Ethereum.

    • This article explains why gold-reserve narratives and state-linked structures can appeal in remittance-heavy emerging markets that still price in dollars.

    • It also lays out the key due diligence checks: reserve custody and attestations, redemption mechanics, admin controls and real-world distribution and liquidity.

    Kyrgyzstan, a Central Asian country with a population of about 7 million, has entered the stablecoin market with USDKG. The token is intended to trade 1:1 with the US dollar, but it uses a different reserve model.

    Instead of relying on cash deposits and short-term US Treasurys, the project says USDKG is backed by physical gold. The initial issuance is 50 million tokens, roughly $50 million at the intended peg. It launched on Tron, and the team says support for Ethereum could follow.

    In many emerging markets, the stablecoin conversation is shifting toward how trust is built: reserve credibility, the politics of what counts as a reliable asset and structures that appear more supervised or state-linked.

    Gold, commodity reserves and government-adjacent issuers can fit into that framework. At the same time, the product still uses the dollar as the unit of account, the one businesses already use for cross-border trade and the one savers often default to when they do not fully trust the local currency.

    Did you know? Remittances from Russia have historically been a large component of household income and external inflows, according to World Bank data. In 2021, remittances were estimated at close to 30% of GDP.

    What is USDKG?

    USDKG is being positioned as a USD-pegged stablecoin, with each token intended to maintain a $1 value. However, the project says the collateral backing the peg is physical gold rather than cash and short-term US Treasurys.

    Public launch details indicate an initial issuance of 50 million tokens, first deployed on Tron. The project also says it plans to expand to Ethereum.

    The issuer structure is also part of the story. Launch communications describe USDKG as being issued by an entity with 100% state participation, while day-to-day operations, including gold management, are handled by a private company registered in Kyrgyzstan under contract with the issuer.

    ConsenSys Diligence has published a review of USDKG’s smart contracts, a code security engagement conducted over a defined period. That may help readers assess onchain contract risk, but it does not, on its own, verify the offchain status of the gold reserves.

    Readers should treat contract security and reserve verification as two separate checklists because they answer two different questions.

    This design may make sense in emerging markets

    Stablecoins can be designed differently when they are aimed at everyday finance rather than decentralized finance. The target user might be a business paying overseas suppliers, a family receiving money from abroad or someone living in a country where access to dollars is limited or inconsistent.

    In that context, the pitch is straightforward: Move value across borders with less friction while keeping a familiar unit of account.

    Kyrgyzstan fits that logic because remittances are a core part of the economy. A World Bank note on digitizing remittances says remittances exceeded 30% of GDP in 2021, which helps explain why cheaper infrastructure and better on- and off-ramps are more than a nice-to-have.

    World Bank country data also suggests remittances remain significant even as totals swing year to year.

    That is where a USD-pegged, gold-backed setup can make sense: Keep the dollar denomination for trade and saving habits while relying on a reserve asset that is widely recognized locally within a more supervised issuer structure.

    Did you know? In recent years, gold has accounted for a large share of exports in Kyrgyzstan, with some estimates in the 30%-40% range depending on the year.

    The “real-asset stablecoin”

    Commodity-linked tokens are not new, but the way they are being structured is changing. Regulatory compliance, credibility and usability beyond crypto-native circles matter far more than they once did.

    A clear cautionary example is Venezuela’s Petro, a state-led, oil-linked crypto that was marketed as a sanctions workaround and a funding tool. It faced repeated questions about credibility, liquidity and whether redemption could work in practice. After years of limited real-world traction, authorities later moved to discontinue the project.

    At the same time, another model has quietly shown there is demand for “digital commodities” when the conversion and redemption story is clearer. Tokenized gold products such as PAX Gold (PAXG) and Tether Gold (XAUT) have been around for years, are explicitly tied to vaulted gold and have grown into a multibillion-dollar niche, alongside rising gold prices and investor interest.

    USDKG is positioned as a hybrid model, combining a USD unit of account with a gold-reserve narrative and a state-linked issuer structure.

    The make-or-break layer of regulation and compliance

    USDKG is not launching into a regulatory vacuum. Kyrgyzstan already has a framework in place. The 2022 Law “On Virtual Assets” sets out basic rules for how virtual assets can be issued, stored and circulated. It also supports the country’s licensing regime for virtual asset service providers, the unglamorous but necessary plumbing if a stablecoin is meant to move through exchanges, brokers and payment on- and off-ramps rather than sit as a standalone token.

    Compliance matters even more if USDKG is positioning itself for cross-border payments and settlement.

    Globally, regulators are pushing in a similar direction. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has repeatedly warned that weak virtual asset service provider (VASP) licensing and supervision, along with poor Travel Rule implementation, can create gaps that are open to abuse. Its more recent targeted updates also urge jurisdictions to look closely at risks tied to stablecoins and offshore service providers.

    Policymakers also keep coming back to the trade-off. Stablecoins can make payments cheaper and faster. In emerging markets, they can also accelerate currency substitution, increase capital flight risk and complicate monetary sovereignty. That is why regulators often focus on controls, disclosures and redemption governance, not only the peg.

    Did you know? The average cost of sending remittances to Central Asia remains well above the UN’s 3% target, which keeps pressure on governments and private actors to experiment with cheaper digital payment alternatives.

    The right questions to ask

    • Redemption reality: Who can redeem USDKG, through which entities and on what timeline? “Gold-backed” only means something if there is a clear, enforceable path from token to cash out, or to gold, with known fees and rules.

    • Reserve custody and verification: Where is the gold stored, under what custody arrangement, and how often is it independently attested? The project has a transparency page that points to an audit, but readers should review the scope carefully.

    • Code security vs. reserve auditing: ConsenSys Diligence’s work is a smart contract security review, useful for assessing onchain risk. It does not, on its own, answer offchain questions such as whether the gold exists, whether it is encumbered or how custody controls work. Treat these as separate proofs.

    • Control and governance: What admin permissions exist, such as pause, freeze and blacklist? Who holds those keys, and what due process standard applies if funds are frozen?

    • Distribution and liquidity: Beyond the launch headlines, where will USDKG actually be usable across exchanges, over-the-counter desks, remittance corridors and merchant infrastructure, and what liquidity supports day-to-day settlement? Reporting confirms an initial issuance of 50 million tokens on Tron, but real usage is the harder milestone.

    What to watch next

    USDKG’s trajectory will depend on proof, not promises. What matters next are clear, independent signals from third parties that the token functions like a real financial instrument in practice.

    Watch for independent reserve attestations over multiple quarters, with custody details and audit scope clearly spelled out, along with redemption rails that demonstrate convertibility under normal conditions.

    Then watch distribution: listings, on- and off-ramps and remittance or trade pilots that create organic demand.

    Kyrgyzstan already has a legal framework. Next, it needs to show that the operating layer is real.

    Source link

    How YouTube’s stablecoin payouts could change creator monetization

    0

    Key takeaways

    • YouTube isn’t changing how creators earn — only how they get paid.

    • The stablecoin payout runs through PayPal’s existing payout infrastructure, with PayPal converting dollars into PYUSD.

    • The feature positions PYUSD as a digital dollar for settlement and fund transfers.

    • Creators may gain faster access and alternative treasury options, but they must also consider fees and the complexity of tax reporting.

    In mid-December 2025, YouTube added a new option to its monetization toolkit: Eligible US creators can now choose to receive payouts in PayPal’s US dollar stablecoin, PayPal USD (PYUSD).

    The update, reported by Fortune, does not change how creators earn money on YouTube, but it does change how that money can reach them.

    For creators, creator-economy operators and fintech observers, the move matters less as a crypto headline and more as a signal. It shows how stablecoins are starting to appear inside mainstream payout systems, not as investment products, but as an alternative rail for moving dollars.

    What actually changed in YouTube’s monetization?

    YouTube’s monetization model is unchanged. Creators still earn revenue from ads, channel memberships, Super Chats, Super Thanks and other features, all calculated and reported in US dollars. The difference comes at the payout stage.

    Previously, creators could receive earnings through traditional bank transfers or PayPal balances in fiat currency. Now, eligible US creators can opt in to receive those same earnings in PYUSD instead of a direct dollar payout. Importantly, this is optional: Creators must actively choose the stablecoin option, and they can continue using standard payout methods if they prefer.

    The rollout is limited to the United States, and YouTube has not announced a timeline for expanding the option to creators in other countries.

    Where stablecoin payouts fit in the money flow

    To understand the impact, it helps to look at the full payout chain.

    • First, creators generate earnings on YouTube.

    • Second, YouTube sends those earnings through its payout processor, primarily PayPal’s Hyperwallet infrastructure.

    • Third, the creator receives the funds.

    With the stablecoin option, the first two steps remain the same. YouTube still sends US dollars to PayPal’s payout system. The change happens at the point of disbursement: Instead of crediting a bank account or a PayPal fiat balance, PayPal converts the payout into PYUSD and credits it to the creator.

    YouTube itself does not issue or custody crypto, and it does not interact directly with blockchains. PayPal sits in the middle, handling the conversion and distribution using its existing rails.

    What “stablecoin payout” means in practice

    A stablecoin payout does not mean creators are suddenly being paid in volatile crypto tokens or exposed to trading risks by default. In practice, it means the payout arrives as a digital dollar represented by PYUSD rather than as a bank deposit.

    Creators who opt in can hold PYUSD within PayPal’s ecosystem, redeem it back into US dollars or transfer it to supported blockchain networks or external wallets, subject to PayPal’s rules and fees. The underlying earnings are still denominated in dollars, and YouTube’s reporting to creators does not change.

    For many creators, the experience may feel similar to receiving a PayPal balance, except the balance is held in a stablecoin rather than traditional electronic money.

    Did you know? According to PayPal and Paxos disclosures, PYUSD is backed by US dollar deposits, short-term US Treasurys and cash equivalents held in reserve.

    Why creators might care

    The stablecoin option introduces several practical considerations for creator monetization.

    • Settlement speed and access: Stablecoins can move at any time of day, including weekends and holidays, whereas traditional bank transfers often depend on business hours and cutoff times. While PayPal’s processing policies still apply, the underlying rails can support faster, around-the-clock settlement once funds are in stablecoin form.

    • Cross-border potential: Although the feature is currently limited to US creators, stablecoins are often promoted as tools for reducing friction in international payments. If similar options were extended globally, creators working with international teams or managing cross-border expenses could potentially benefit from fewer banking intermediaries. For now, this remains a future possibility rather than a present reality.

    • Fees and conversions: Stablecoin payouts do not eliminate costs. Creators may still face PayPal payout fees, blockchain network fees if they move PYUSD onchain and conversion or off-ramp costs when converting PYUSD back into fiat currency. The economics will depend on individual usage patterns rather than offering automatic savings.

    • Treasury management: Receiving PYUSD gives creators another way to hold dollar-denominated value. For teams managing cash flow, this can introduce flexibility, but it also adds another asset type to track and reconcile.

    New risks and responsibilities to watch out for

    The addition of stablecoin payouts also brings new considerations:

    • From a tax and accounting perspective, receiving stablecoins can increase record-keeping complexity. While earnings are still generated in dollars, subsequent transfers, conversions or uses of PYUSD may have tax implications depending on jurisdiction. Creators don’t receive legal or tax advice from YouTube or PayPal, and professional guidance remains important.

    • Receiving PYUSD doesn’t eliminate costs. Creators may still pay PayPal or Hyperwallet payout fees, blockchain network fees if they move PYUSD onchain and conversion or off-ramp fees when converting PYUSD back into fiat.

    • There is also platform and counterparty risk. PYUSD relies on PayPal’s infrastructure and Paxos’s issuance and reserve management. Holding or transferring stablecoins introduces a different risk profile than holding funds in a traditional bank account, even when the asset is dollar-pegged.

    • Finally, stablecoins operate in a regulatory environment that continues to evolve. While PYUSD is issued by a regulated entity, broader policy changes could affect how stablecoins are treated, reported or supported in the future.

    Part of a broader payments trend

    YouTube’s move fits into a wider pattern. Stablecoins are increasingly being positioned as payment and settlement tools rather than purely crypto-native instruments. Partnerships between payment companies, crypto exchanges and stablecoin issuers (for example, Visa and Circle) have focused on improving liquidity, redemption and integration with existing financial systems.

    Seen in that context, YouTube’s stablecoin payout option is less about crypto enthusiasm and more about infrastructure choice. It reflects a world where digital dollars coexist with bank deposits as alternative ways to move value.

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

    Source link

    New protocol targets redemption delays in $20B tokenized market

    0

    Uniform Labs, a blockchain infrastructure company founded by veterans of Standard Chartered, has launched a new protocol designed to address persistent liquidity constraints in the emerging tokenization market.

    Announced on Wednesday, Uniform Labs unveiled Multiliquid, a protocol designed to enable 24/7 conversions between tokenized money market funds and major stablecoins, including USDC (USDC) and USDt (USDT).

    At launch, Multiliquid supports integrations with tokenized Treasury assets issued by Wellington Management and other asset managers, allowing institutional holders to access on-demand liquidity rather than relying on issuer-controlled redemption windows.

    The launch comes as tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) continue to expand, with the market currently valued at around $20 billion, according to industry data. While that figure is below a peak of over $30 billion earlier this year, growth has remained steady, particularly in tokenized Treasury products.

    Total RWA market size, excluding stablecoins. Source: RWA.xyz

    Uniform Labs said the protocol was developed in response to the GENIUS Act, recent US stablecoin legislation that establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins but prohibits issuers from paying yield directly to holders.

    In that regulatory environment, the company said, Multiliquid is designed to keep stablecoins as pure payment instruments while enabling yield to be generated through regulated tokenized money market funds and other RWAs connected via its swap layer.

    Related: US banks could soon issue stablecoins under FDIC plan to implement GENIUS Act

    Liquidity risks shadow the rapid growth of tokenized money market funds

    Tokenized money market funds have emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments of the RWA landscape, alongside private credit and tokenized US Treasury bonds. However, their rapid growth has also exposed a persistent weakness: Liquidity often remains constrained by traditional redemption processes, limiting their usefulness in round-the-clock onchain markets.

    That concern was recently highlighted by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which acknowledged the expansion of tokenized money market funds — from $770 million to nearly $9 billion in assets in about two years — but warned that the sector faces material liquidity risks.

    As these funds increasingly serve as a source of collateral in crypto markets, the BIS noted that they could introduce operational and liquidity risks if onchain demand for redemptions outpaces the availability of offchain liquidity, particularly during periods of market stress.

    Source: Fintech.TV

    Their use as collateral could expand as more financial institutions begin to view tokenized funds as a form of “cash as an asset,” potentially offsetting growth in stablecoins, according to JPMorgan strategist Teresa Ho.

    Magazine: The one thing these 6 global crypto hubs all have in common…