More
    Home Blog Page 4

    WIF Price Prediction: $0.45 Target by End of January as Technical Indicators Signal Bullish Breakout

    0


    Felix Pinkston
    Jan 05, 2026 14:16

    Dogwifhat (WIF) shows bullish momentum with MACD histogram turning positive and RSI at neutral 59.50. Technical analysis suggests $0.45 target within 3-4 weeks.





    WIF Price Prediction: Technical Setup Points to $0.45 January Target

    Dogwifhat (WIF) is displaying compelling technical signals that suggest a potential rally toward $0.45 by the end of January 2026. Trading at $0.39, the meme coin has positioned itself near critical resistance levels while technical indicators show improving momentum that could fuel the next leg higher.

    WIF Price Prediction Summary

    WIF short-term target (1 week): $0.43 (+10%)
    Dogwifhat medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.40-$0.48 range
    Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.43
    Critical support if bearish: $0.26

    Recent dogwifhat Price Predictions from Analysts

    The latest WIF price prediction consensus from major analysts shows moderate bullish sentiment despite the current Fear & Greed Index reading of 28-29. CoinCodex projects a conservative $0.3234 short-term target, while Blockchain.News maintains a more optimistic dogwifhat forecast of $0.38 based on whale accumulation patterns and oversold conditions.

    Hexn.io’s analysis aligns with the $0.33 range, though their WIF price prediction methodology focuses heavily on sentiment indicators. The most bullish long-term outlook comes from Benzinga, projecting $2.11 by 2030 – a forecast that would require significant meme coin sector expansion and sustained retail interest.

    The consensus range of $0.32-$0.38 appears conservative given current technical positioning, suggesting potential upside beyond these analyst targets.

    WIF Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Breakout

    The dogwifhat technical analysis reveals several bullish confluences forming. WIF’s position at 0.9880 on the Bollinger Bands indicates the price is testing upper band resistance at $0.39, typically a precursor to either a rejection or breakout scenario. The MACD histogram’s positive reading of 0.0121 suggests bullish momentum is building, while the RSI at 59.50 provides room for further upside without entering overbought territory.

    Volume analysis shows $59.3 million in 24-hour Binance spot trading, indicating healthy liquidity for any directional move. The key technical pattern emerging is WIF’s ability to hold above all short-term moving averages (SMA 7 and SMA 20 both at $0.33), while approaching the SMA 50 at $0.36 – a level that has acted as dynamic resistance.

    The daily ATR of $0.03 suggests normal volatility conditions, supporting the view that any breakout could sustain momentum rather than experiencing immediate mean reversion.

    dogwifhat Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios

    Bullish Case for WIF

    A WIF price target of $0.45 becomes achievable if the token can decisively break above $0.43 immediate resistance. This level represents a 23% gain from current prices and would require:

    • Daily close above $0.43 with strong volume confirmation
    • RSI maintaining above 65 without reaching extreme overbought levels
    • MACD line crossing above the signal line for additional momentum confirmation

    Secondary targets include $0.48 (strong resistance) and potentially $0.52 if broader meme coin sector strength continues. The dogwifhat forecast for this scenario suggests a 2-3 week timeline for the initial $0.45 target.

    Bearish Risk for dogwifhat

    Downside risks center on the $0.26 support level, which coincides with both the 52-week low and Bollinger Band lower boundary. A break below this level could trigger a WIF price prediction of $0.22-$0.24, representing a 40%+ decline from current levels.

    Warning signs include:
    – Daily RSI dropping below 45
    – MACD histogram turning increasingly negative
    – Volume spike on any move below $0.33 support

    Should You Buy WIF Now? Entry Strategy

    Current technical positioning suggests a buy or sell WIF decision favors buyers with proper risk management. Optimal entry points include:

    • Immediate entry: $0.38-$0.39 range with stop-loss at $0.33
    • Pullback entry: $0.35-$0.36 if price retests SMA 50 support
    • Breakout entry: Above $0.43 with volume confirmation

    Risk management requires a strict stop-loss at $0.32, representing the breakdown level where the bullish thesis would be invalidated. Position sizing should account for the 18% stop-loss distance, suggesting smaller position sizes for conservative traders.

    WIF Price Prediction Conclusion

    The dogwifhat forecast points to a bullish bias with a WIF price target of $0.45 by month-end, representing a confidence level of MEDIUM. This prediction relies on the technical setup holding above $0.33 support while momentum indicators continue improving.

    Key validation signals include a daily close above $0.43 and RSI maintaining above 60. Failure to hold $0.33 or a breakdown below the Bollinger Band middle line would invalidate this bullish WIF price prediction and suggest revisiting the $0.26 support zone instead.

    The 3-4 week timeline allows sufficient time for the technical pattern to develop while accounting for potential market volatility that could impact meme coin sentiment.

    Image source: Shutterstock


    Source link

    ZachXBT Exposes $2-Million Coinbase Impersonation Scam Onchain Clues

    0

    Key takeaways:

    • A convincing “Coinbase support” impersonation campaign was linked by onchain investigator ZachXBT to roughly $2 million in stolen crypto.

    • The attribution relied on corroboration across multiple signals, including onchain activity and Telegram or social media footprints rather than a single “magic” transaction.

    • Coinbase says its real support team will never ask for your password or 2FA codes or request that you move funds to a so-called “safe” address.

    • These schemes are part of a broader fraud wave. The FBI reported more than $16 billion in internet crime losses in 2024 based on 859,532 complaints.

    A caller claiming to be “Coinbase support” can sound polished, patient and strangely urgent, which is exactly the mix that makes smart people move too fast. In a recent case, onchain investigator ZachXBT said this kind of impersonation campaign netted an alleged scammer roughly $2 million in crypto from Coinbase users and that the suspect’s own online footprint helped connect the dots.

    Indeed, some of the biggest threats in crypto are not smart contracts or zero-day exploits, but routine social engineering. These are the same low-tech pressure tactics appearing across the internet at scale. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) says reported cybercrime losses in 2024 exceeded $16 billion, and many schemes begin with nothing more than a convincing message or a spoofed call.

    Did you know? In 2024, the FBI said people aged 60 and older were hit hardest overall, reporting nearly $5 billion in losses.

    What happened?

    The case ZachXBT flagged was an old-school confidence trick dressed up as “customer support.”

    According to ZachXBT, an alleged scammer posed as a Coinbase help desk worker and used social engineering tactics to convince victims he worked for the exchange, with losses totaling roughly $2 million over the past year.

    ZachXBT said he was able to narrow in on the suspect by cross-referencing Telegram group chat screenshots, social media posts and onchain activity, and by sharing a leaked video that appeared to show the alleged scammer speaking with a victim while offering fake support.

    The scam leaned on urgency and authority, including warnings about suspicious access, a so-called “security procedure” and pressure to act immediately.

    Coinbase has repeatedly warned that scammers may spoof phone numbers and pose as employees, attempting to push users into “protecting” their funds by moving them. The company says legitimate support will never ask for passwords, two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, seed phrases or transfers to a “safe” address or new wallet.

    Did you know? ZachXBT also claimed the operator tried to muddy the trail by buying “expensive Telegram usernames” and repeatedly deleting old accounts; however, it was still “easy” to hone in on the individual due to their frequent online gloating and lifestyle posts that ignored basic operational security.

    Who is ZachXBT?

    ZachXBT is a pseudonymous onchain investigator who has built a reputation by publishing detailed public threads about hacks, scams and suspicious fund movements, often before exchanges or authorities comment.

    Major outlets have profiled him as an independent “crypto detective,” and his work has been cited in real-world cases where investigators later moved in on suspects.

    This is why a ZachXBT post can race through the industry in hours. When he publishes an attribution claim, it can trigger new victim reports, push platforms to review accounts linked to the activity and shape how the wider market talks about an incident.

    Coinbase’s own warnings and the hard truth about “support”

    Coinbase’s security guidance on impersonation scams is unusually blunt. If someone contacts you claiming to be from Coinbase and pushes you to act fast, assume it is malicious until proven otherwise.

    Coinbase warns that scammers regularly pose as employees and attempt to pressure users into moving funds. The company says no one will ever ask for your password or 2FA codes or request that you transfer assets to a specific or “new” address, account, vault or wallet.

    In a dedicated blog post about customer support scams, Coinbase emphasizes the same pattern: Do not share login details or verification codes, do not click third-party links or install software at a caller’s request, and only reach support through official channels, not numbers or links provided to you out of the blue.

    Adopt a default reflex to slow down, end the conversation and verify independently. Social engineering works when the attacker controls the tempo. Coinbase’s guidance is designed to break that tempo before money moves.

    When data access feeds social engineering

    One reason “support” scams can feel so convincing is that criminals sometimes show up with real context, such as a name, phone number, partial identifiers or account hints that make the call feel legitimate.

    In May 2025, Coinbase disclosed an extortion attempt tied to rogue overseas support agents who were allegedly bribed or recruited to pull customer data from internal support systems, specifically to enable social engineering attacks. Coinbase said passwords, private keys and wallet access were not compromised but added that it would reimburse customers who were tricked into sending funds to attackers.

    For impersonation crews, personal data is force-multiplying fuel. It makes the lie easier to sell and hesitation harder to sustain.

    “Support” is the attack surface, and stolen context worsens it

    When someone reaches out claiming to be “Coinbase support” and tries to rush you into a decision, the safest general assumption is that you are dealing with an impostor.

    Coinbase says it will never ask you to move or “secure” funds, request a seed phrase, ask for your password or two-step verification codes, or push you to install software on your device. The company also warns that scammers can spoof legitimate phone numbers, making caller ID a weak signal.

    That is why Coinbase’s own consumer protection posts keep returning to the same principle: Break the attacker’s tempo. End the call or chat, then verify independently through official channels rather than using any number, link or “case ID” given to you in the moment.

    The uncomfortable reality is that these scams can become far more persuasive when criminals have real personal details to weave into the pitch.

    You do not need to be outsmarted onchain to lose money in crypto. In many cases, you only need to be rushed at the wrong moment by someone who sounds credible, and sometimes, that credibility is built on stolen context.

    This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

    Source link

    Starknet Mainnet Is Experiencing Fresh Downtime

    0

    Starknet, an Ethereum layer‑2 network that uses zero‑knowledge (ZK) rollups, is experiencing fresh mainnet disruption as the project enters 2026.

    In an X post, the Starknet team said the network was facing downtime and that engineers were “actively investigating the issue and working to restore full functionality as quickly as possible,” without immediately disclosing a root cause. At the time of writing, the network had been experiencing downtime for just over two hours.

    ​Starknet is a ZK‑rollup–based layer 2 that batches transactions offchain and posts cryptographic proofs to Ethereum, aiming to deliver higher throughput and lower fees for smart contracts, decentralized finance and gaming applications while inheriting Ethereum’s base‑layer security. 

    Starknet mainnet is down. Source: Voyager Online

    The project has also promoted a Bitcoin DeFi, or BTCFi, arc, pitching itself as infrastructure for bringing Bitcoin‑related financial applications into the Ethereum ecosystem. Despite the network disruption, the STRK token price held steady at the time of writing.

    Ethereum, Layer2, Mainnet
    STRK token price remained steady. Source: CoinMarketCap

    Related: Ethereum’s first ZK-rollup, ZKsync Lite, to be retired in 2026

    Not the first time Starknet mainnet is down

    ​The incident follows a series of outages in 2025 that have put Starknet’s reliability under closer scrutiny. In September, a major upgrade known as Grinta (v0.14.0) led to an extended mainnet disruption in which block production was halted and two chain reorganizations were required, reverting around an hour of activity and forcing users to resubmit affected transactions. 

    That episode followed an earlier multi‑hour outage in 2025 tied to sequencer issues, with external trackers logging multiple incidents of slow or halted block creation across the year.

    ​A Starknet incident report on the September event said the Grinta‑related downtime lasted roughly nine hours and traced the problems to a sequence of issues, including failures in Ethereum RPC providers and bugs that affected sequencer behavior, prompting the team to commit to architectural changes and expanded monitoring. 

    A representative from Starknet told Cointelegraph that the team was working to repair the fresh incident.